that an appropriate antibiotic was prescribed (in terms of choice of molecule, dose and interval of administration) and that the outcome was favourable under this treatment. Parts A and B used the same 15 clinical vignettes, each one describing a specific disease, assuming for each a ‘best case scenario’, i.e. The questionnaire first collected information on respondents’ characteristics (nine questions) and then comprised two parts: (A) the usual practice of respondents regarding recommendations they make to clinicians in their hospital or in primary care (outside their own department) regarding total durations of antibiotic treatment and (B) the shortest total duration that they would be willing to recommend for the same cases. 17 It was first pilot-tested among ESGAP and SPILF Executive Committee members to check for clarity and conciseness. The 25-item questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary group of experts in infectious diseases, microbiology and public health, based on a literature review (File S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online). Hospital-based healthcare professionals (fully trained or in training) who were giving at least weekly advice to colleagues (outside their home department) on their antibiotic prescriptions could participate in this survey. Methods Study designĮSGAP (ESCMID Study Group for Antimicrobial stewardshiP) and SPILF (French Infectious Diseases Society) conducted a cross-sectional international Internet-based survey on duration of antibiotic treatments. Our hypothesis was that not all of them are ready to advise short durations and this could be a barrier to implementation of guidelines and strategies promoting short durations of antibiotic therapy. The objective of our international cross-sectional survey was thus to describe current practices of infection specialists as well as their willingness to shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy. 6, 16 No study has, however, explored the current practices of infection specialists, who are often members of an antibiotic stewardship team, regarding duration of antibiotic therapy. Most antibiotic stewardship guidelines recommend that stewardship teams implement guidelines and strategies to promote the shortest effective duration of antibiotic therapy. In order to contact the Section President, click on the name and an email with the email address will open in Outlook.Using the shortest possible duration of antibiotic treatment is a key component of responsible antibiotic use, 1–3 with some studies suggesting that shortened durations can limit the emergence of bacterial resistance, 4–6 without compromising clinical outcomes. The official use of section abbreviations can be found here. You can also find out how to set up a themed Section. You do not need to be a EUPHA member to either set up an account or sign up for the sections. If you would like to receive the regular section updates, you can sign up either through your EUPHA account or via the various section pages. To find out more about a section, please click on a section below. The goal is to bring together researchers, policymakers and practitioners working in the same field for knowledge sharing and capacity building.ĮUPHA has 26 operational sections. EUPHA encourages the creation of sections for specific public health themes, which are international and open to all public health experts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |